Has agentic orchestration replaced the workflow engine?
Agents change who decides what happens next. They do not remove the need to execute those decisions reliably, safely and with scientific provenance.
Read articleScience Architects · By Adrian Rossall
Independent thinking on AI architecture for science. I write about how agents, data, compute and scientific workflows fit together, drawing on two decades of building scientific platforms.
Practical thinking for leaders building AI-enabled scientific platforms.
Hypotheses · decisions · accountable outcomes
People · workflow · governance
Data · models · instruments · agents
Identity · provenance · compute · observability
Scientific intent sets the direction. Foundations make the evidence trustworthy.
01 / WRITING
Notes on the architecture beneath modern scientific discovery: where data, computation, laboratories and AI agents become one system.
Agents change who decides what happens next. They do not remove the need to execute those decisions reliably, safely and with scientific provenance.
Read articleFrontier models are rapidly commoditising scientific reasoning and tool use. The durable value is moving to project state, provenance and the joins between systems.
Read articleHow platform foundations, scientific ecosystems and agentic science build on one another.
Read article02 / ARCHITECTURE
The architecture has to connect scientific intent all the way down to the foundations that make a result reproducible, explainable and useful.
Follow the connections between agents, workflows, scientific tools and evidence.
A scientific platform is only useful when it improves the quality, speed or confidence of a decision. Understand that decision before choosing technologies.
Value is created between data, models, instruments, workflows and people. Those boundaries and contracts deserve more attention than any individual tool.
Identity, lineage, reproducibility and accountable human judgement are platform capabilities. They cannot be retrofitted as reporting features.
Systems inherit the boundaries of the teams that build and operate them. Architecture must account for ownership, incentives and how teams manage change.
03 / ADRIAN ROSSALL
I work at the point where scientific ambition becomes an operable system.
Over two decades, I have designed and led scientific platforms spanning laboratory automation, research data, computational chemistry, machine learning, scalable compute and AI-enabled drug discovery. That experience informs the architecture and writing I share here.
Full profile on LinkedInSCIENCE ARCHITECTS
Follow my writing and join the discussion on the architecture behind scientific discovery.
Connect on LinkedIn